Did you know that the Fidalgo Pool and Fitness Center will be on the ballot again this November based on forming a Metropolitan Park District (MPD) to replace the Fidalgo Park and Recreation District (PRD)? The pool, a community hub since 1975, serves over 6,500 visitors monthly and supports youth and adult swim teams. Proponents, including Executive Director Dahlen (appointed April 2025), argue the MPD ensures stable funding for the aging facility. Critics warn of a 30% tax increase, forced annexation of Guemes Island, and loss of voter control. This blog examines both sides to help residents decide, using Washington State regulations (RCW 36.69 for PRD, RCW 35.61 for MPD) and community input. A comparison table below details key differences.
Why Support the MPD?
The MPD proposal, backed by the Fidalgo Pool and Fitness Center and Friends of the Pool, aims to secure long-term funding for the 50-year-old facility, which faces compliance issues and potential $30 million replacement costs. The current PRD relies on a six-year Operations and Maintenance (O&M) levy ($0.092 per $1,000 assessed value), requiring 60% voter approval for renewal. A failure, as occurred 31 years ago, could disrupt operations. The MPD’s permanent levy ($0.12 per $1,000) eliminates this risk, ensuring predictable funds and improving loan access for repairs. Proponents argue it replaces the current levy, not adding a new tax, and aligns boundaries with the Anacortes School District, spreading costs across Fidalgo and Guemes Islands. Public oversight remains via elected commissioners and voter approval for levy increases beyond 1% annually or bonds for new facilities.
Why Oppose the MPD?
Critics argue the MPD imposes unnecessary burdens. Residents claim the proposed levy ($0.12 per $1,000) raises taxes by ~30% from $0.092 per $1000, hitting fixed-income households hard. Guemes Island’s inclusion is contentious, with over 60% of Guemes voters rejecting the MPD in 2024, citing limited access due to ferry costs and “political overreach.” The permanent levy removes the six-year voter renewal, giving five commissioners authority over budgets, which critics call a loss of voting rights. With levies consistently approved for 30 years and the option to seek funds before 2027, opponents question the need for change, viewing it as a power grab. The 2024 vote’s narrow defeat (4,410 against, 4,407 for) reflects deep community division.
What Should Residents Do?
Vote Yes if you prioritize permanent levy for stable funding for the pool’s future, value improved loan access for repairs, and support regional cost-sharing. The MPD addresses the facility’s aging infrastructure and avoids the risk of levy failures.
Vote No if you oppose the 30% tax increase, resent Guemes Island’s inclusion against strong opposition, or value direct voter control via levy renewals. The PRD’s 30-year success and flexibility suggest it may suffice.
Residents from both Anacortes and Guemes Island can engage at commissioner meetings (third Thursday, 5:30 pm, commissioners@fidalgopool.com) or visit fidalgopool.com for updates. The November 2025 vote will shape the pool’s future—decide what balance of the pool’s financial stability and voter control works for you!
Sal Walker
Anacortes, WA